
19-06-2025 22:19
Björn NordénBig thanks in advance.

11-06-2025 16:26
Hi everyone, I am looking for the following protol

18-06-2025 19:24

Good evening,On Oenanthe aquatica we collected a

18-06-2025 16:24

Bonjour,Un minuscule stade imparfait, qui pousse s

13-06-2025 16:34

Bonjour,Un petit discomycète qui me résiste. Il

17-06-2025 12:10
Del pasado dia 4 en bosque de hayas, en tierraA

12-03-2025 17:54
Karl Soler KinnerbäckHi all!Do you agree with Scutellinia hyperborea? P

17-06-2025 12:02
Del pasado sabado, en bosque de hayas y avellanos,

13-06-2025 09:41
Hello.A cerebriform ascomycete sprouting scattered
Fuscolachnum on Sphagnum?
Edvin Johannesen,
12-02-2024 23:41

Hans-Otto Baral,
13-02-2024 09:48

Re : Fuscolachnum on Sphagnum?
Fuscolachnum is a goos idea, but you have no photo of the hairs?
Edvin Johannesen,
13-02-2024 10:21
Hans-Otto Baral,
13-02-2024 11:14

Re : Fuscolachnum on Sphagnum?
Not sure if your previous posting disappeared. Now I see clearly. Since I have nothing in my database and mind, I suggest to ask someone like Timo or Seppo who were dealing with moss-inhabiting species. Or George Greiff.
Edvin Johannesen,
13-02-2024 11:18

Re : Fuscolachnum on Sphagnum?
OK, thanks, Zotto.
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-02-2024 07:51

Re : Fuscolachnum on Sphagnum?
I did not remember a post by Nina which appears to be the same. Spores measured *4,6 (4,1-5,4) x 1,3 (1,2-1,6). It was Febr. 2013:
Edvin Johannesen,
14-02-2024 09:34

Re : Fuscolachnum on Sphagnum?
Thanks again - it is definitely the same species!
Georges Greiff,
15-02-2024 20:26
Re : Fuscolachnum on Sphagnum?
Hi Edvin,
This is a nice species, and good to see it being found a second time – I remember being intrigued by Nina's observation. I agree that Fuscolachnum is a good bet for the genus. The only species described from bryophytes is F. necator on Polytrichum, but that species has significantly longer spores. It may be worth comparing critically to the species known from vascular plants since bryophyte capsules are often, but not always, domains of more generalist fungi. If it does not match, then it is likely something new, as is often the case with smaller and more obscure bryophilous ascos.
All the best,
George
This is a nice species, and good to see it being found a second time – I remember being intrigued by Nina's observation. I agree that Fuscolachnum is a good bet for the genus. The only species described from bryophytes is F. necator on Polytrichum, but that species has significantly longer spores. It may be worth comparing critically to the species known from vascular plants since bryophyte capsules are often, but not always, domains of more generalist fungi. If it does not match, then it is likely something new, as is often the case with smaller and more obscure bryophilous ascos.
All the best,
George
Edvin Johannesen,
15-02-2024 22:47

Re : Fuscolachnum on Sphagnum?
Thanks for your comments, Georges. I am awaiting comments from Seppo Huhtinen. Let's see what/if he has an opinion.