Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-11-2009 22:22

Pablo Chacón Pablo Chacón

Bonne nuit, Voir si vous m'avez élaguée appor

07-12-2015 14:17

Zugna Marino Zugna Marino

Buon giorno a tutti, ad un primo momento, non ess

25-11-2012 20:32

Bometon Javier Bometon Javier

Ascomas cupoliformes abiertos lateralmente, himeni

25-01-2026 16:08

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Geoglossum had spores mostly 70-80 (87) with

27-01-2026 11:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Is anyone with experience of DNA testing able to t

26-01-2026 11:49

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this possible anamorph on a dead Cytisus

25-01-2026 23:23

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc

18-01-2026 12:24

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin

23-01-2026 21:50

Cameron DK

I am looking for this please publication. is anyon

10-01-2026 20:00

Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
ruiz Jose, 20-02-2024 22:58
Hola en resto de herbáceas sin determinar, ¿de tamaño 1a 2 mm
puede encajar en macroguttatus?
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
  • message #78350
Nihad Omerovic, 21-02-2024 00:32
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Looks like Rutstroemia, possibly R. henningsiana/paludosa (not sure about croziers).
ruiz Jose, 21-02-2024 08:03
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Nihad,las estructuras del excipulo no parecen de rutstroemia.
Hans-Otto Baral, 21-02-2024 08:50
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Yes it is rutstroemiaceous from the apical ring shape. Croziers seem to be absent, so R. henningsiana/paludosa would be the choice (now Clarireedia). But the host looks like Equisetum?
Michel Hairaud, 21-02-2024 09:26
Michel Hairaud
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hi Ruiz, 

The IKI reaction shows a Sclerotiniaceae-type one rather than Heliotiaceae. (Which excludes Hymenoscyphus) The ectal is not Globulosa so Rutstroemiaceae seems more appropriate
May be another preparation with a different angle in the excipulum would show a more Rustroemiacea-like ectal . 
My guess is the same as Zotto's, depending on presence or not of croziers, in the genera Clareeridia. 
Amitiés
Michel
ruiz Jose, 21-02-2024 10:21
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Ok,muchas gracias,por la la aclaración,el excipulo no me pareció de Rutstroemia.saludos
ruiz Jose, 21-02-2024 10:22
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
No sabría precisar la planta Zotto.
ruiz Jose, 21-02-2024 10:31
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Michel,me queda algo del único ejemplar,lo intentaré hacer,pero en estos tamaños tan diminutos me cuesta sacar cortes apropiados.saludos y gracias