
18-06-2025 16:24

Bonjour,Un minuscule stade imparfait, qui pousse s

18-06-2025 19:24

Good evening,On Oenanthe aquatica we collected a

13-06-2025 16:34

Bonjour,Un petit discomycète qui me résiste. Il

11-06-2025 16:26
Hi everyone, I am looking for the following protol

17-06-2025 12:10
Del pasado dia 4 en bosque de hayas, en tierraA

12-03-2025 17:54
Karl Soler KinnerbäckHi all!Do you agree with Scutellinia hyperborea? P

17-06-2025 12:02
Del pasado sabado, en bosque de hayas y avellanos,

13-06-2025 09:41
Hello.A cerebriform ascomycete sprouting scattered
Lamprospora aff. tuberculata
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
19-03-2024 15:22

The only species I find fitting to large extent is L. tuberculata, in fact. But - my most problem ist that no moss like Pleuridium could be found in the vicinity.
The very likely host is a Pottiaceae, and in another forum I posted fotos of this moss that could be determined by a moss-expert with some doubt as cf. Trichostomum triumphans:
https://nafoku.de/forum/202403_0023_0001.htm
In the vicinity there was another moss growing, it is Bryum klingraeffii :
https://nafoku.de/forum/202403_0030_0001.htm
The morphology of the fungus fits quite well with L. tuberculata as I would say (?) - the spores are about 11-13 µm without ornament (hard to measure) and about 13-17 µm with. The "warts" are roundish and about 1,5-3,5 µm large. But what about the moss host? For L. tuberculatella the moss would perhaps be "o.k." - but the warts on the spores of this species are definitely smaller.
Can somebody bring more clarity?
Best regards, Lothar
(fotos 1-3 fungus, 4: likely host-moss dry, 5-7 in water 2013, 8-9 in KOngo-NH3 2024, 10 in water 2024, 11-16 in lactophenolic cotton blue 2024).
Stephen Wharton,
20-03-2024 16:05

Re : Lamprospora aff. tuberculata
The moss looks like a Weissia species probably controversa - involute leaf margins, mucronate apex, crisped when dry. I hope this helps a little.
Stephen
Stephen
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
20-03-2024 18:42

Re : Lamprospora aff. tuberculata
Hello Stephen,
thank you.
But - as I already wrote the moss was determined by a moss expert with a bit of doubt as Trichostomum triumphans. I gave a link in my post (nafoku) where I posted several microfotos of the moss.
Yours, Lothar
thank you.
But - as I already wrote the moss was determined by a moss expert with a bit of doubt as Trichostomum triumphans. I gave a link in my post (nafoku) where I posted several microfotos of the moss.
Yours, Lothar