Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

14-02-2026 19:09

Valencia Lopez Francisco Javier

Hola colegasEstoi interesado en este articulo, Agn

13-02-2026 18:05

Margot en Geert Vullings

On February 9, 2026, we found these small hairy di

14-02-2026 10:58

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

13-02-2026 03:30

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found these immersed perithecia on a stic

13-02-2026 18:02

Nogueira Héctor

November 2025 León (SPAIN) ID Help Hello! Thi

12-02-2026 21:34

patrice Callard

Bonjour, la face inférieure des feuilles ce certa

11-02-2026 22:15

William Slosse William Slosse

Today, February 11, 2026, we found the following R

12-02-2026 14:55

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10581810

11-02-2026 19:28

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

on small deciduous twig on the ground in forest wi

25-04-2025 17:24

Stefan Blaser

Hi everybody, This collection was collected by JÃ

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Francisco Calaça, 07-10-2024 05:02
Francisco CalaçaHi there! A long time I dont figure here! How are you all?

I found this "Podospora" lato sensu on horse dung. It seems have 512 ascospores, according with some colleagues, but i calculated the asci and ascospores volume to obtain obtain an average estimate of how many spores could fit in the ascus, I considered about 80% of the ascus volume being occupied and got a total of approximately 2024 spores. I am not familiar with species that have this total, and those that do, like Podospora praecox and P. serotina, which have around 2048 spores (which is not too far off, considering a margin of error), have spores much smaller than mine. The spores I found are on average 18 x 11 micrometers, and the ascus measures approximately 250 micrometers in length by 120 micrometers in width. My sample closely resembles P. prolifica (around 1024-spored) due to the perithecium characteristics, and P. longicollis (around 512-spored) in terms of spore size. I did not observe appendages on the spores, even on the immature ones. Any suggestions?"

Thank you!


Calaça.

  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
Michel Delpont, 07-10-2024 10:31
Michel Delpont
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hi Francisco.

Nice to hear from you; I see you always find interesting species. According to Cailleux's work your mushroom could be close to P.praecox, but the absence of appendages on the spores is problematic unless they quickly collapsed, but I doubt it. You show hairs on the perithecium, what are they like? Could you take pictures?


Michel.

Francisco Calaça, 09-10-2024 05:12
Francisco Calaça
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hi, Michel, how are you, my friend! Nice to hear from you too! 
Yep, but I suppose these fungi simple found me in fact :-D
I read about your suggestion, but I not to certain about... Im working on Pseudoechria (https://www.facesoffungi.org/pseudoechria/), once some species resembles my material, specially Pseudoechria longicollis. See the images of perithecial hairs. What do you think? Can you send me this Cailleux's work? Im not certain if I have it...

See you!
Thanks,

Calaça.
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
Michel Delpont, 09-10-2024 11:51
Michel Delpont
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hello Francesco.

Quite a few health issues, but life goes on!
I didn't know about this new genre, interesting! On the other hand, in your photos, the hairs don't seem to form tufts and we can't see the partitions. Were you able to observe the germinative pores?
I'll send you the article directly.
Best regards.
Michel.