Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

28-07-2011 18:31

Alex Akulov Alex Akulov

Dear FriendsToday I made the pdf file of Velenovsk

25-12-2019 17:54

Valencia Lopez Francisco Javier

Hola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en

12-07-2015 00:05

Nedim Jukic Nedim Jukic

This one from the same locality as the previous on

12-11-2019 10:32

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous

28-08-2014 18:36

Rubén Martínez-Gil Rubén Martínez-Gil

Hola a todos. Subo unas fotos de un asco que enco

31-05-2026 22:53

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je n'ai pas d'idée pour cette esp

30-05-2026 21:12

Philippe PELLICIER

Sur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,

31-05-2026 10:35

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello,I collected this species growing on a rather

25-05-2026 16:35

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,

29-05-2026 15:35

daniel FERRE

Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Francisco Calaça, 07-10-2024 05:02
Francisco CalaçaHi there! A long time I dont figure here! How are you all?

I found this "Podospora" lato sensu on horse dung. It seems have 512 ascospores, according with some colleagues, but i calculated the asci and ascospores volume to obtain obtain an average estimate of how many spores could fit in the ascus, I considered about 80% of the ascus volume being occupied and got a total of approximately 2024 spores. I am not familiar with species that have this total, and those that do, like Podospora praecox and P. serotina, which have around 2048 spores (which is not too far off, considering a margin of error), have spores much smaller than mine. The spores I found are on average 18 x 11 micrometers, and the ascus measures approximately 250 micrometers in length by 120 micrometers in width. My sample closely resembles P. prolifica (around 1024-spored) due to the perithecium characteristics, and P. longicollis (around 512-spored) in terms of spore size. I did not observe appendages on the spores, even on the immature ones. Any suggestions?"

Thank you!


Calaça.

  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
Michel Delpont, 07-10-2024 10:31
Michel Delpont
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hi Francisco.

Nice to hear from you; I see you always find interesting species. According to Cailleux's work your mushroom could be close to P.praecox, but the absence of appendages on the spores is problematic unless they quickly collapsed, but I doubt it. You show hairs on the perithecium, what are they like? Could you take pictures?


Michel.

Francisco Calaça, 09-10-2024 05:12
Francisco Calaça
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hi, Michel, how are you, my friend! Nice to hear from you too! 
Yep, but I suppose these fungi simple found me in fact :-D
I read about your suggestion, but I not to certain about... Im working on Pseudoechria (https://www.facesoffungi.org/pseudoechria/), once some species resembles my material, specially Pseudoechria longicollis. See the images of perithecial hairs. What do you think? Can you send me this Cailleux's work? Im not certain if I have it...

See you!
Thanks,

Calaça.
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
Michel Delpont, 09-10-2024 11:51
Michel Delpont
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hello Francesco.

Quite a few health issues, but life goes on!
I didn't know about this new genre, interesting! On the other hand, in your photos, the hairs don't seem to form tufts and we can't see the partitions. Were you able to observe the germinative pores?
I'll send you the article directly.
Best regards.
Michel.