Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

11-09-2025 16:57

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

10-09-2025 17:18

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

02-09-2025 11:34

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

10-09-2025 23:53

Marcel Heyligen Marcel Heyligen

Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor

07-09-2025 08:19

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Tiny pinkish discomycetes, photographed and

09-09-2025 12:07

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonjour amis mycologues,Trouvé sur moquette de ch

08-09-2025 19:07

ruiz Jose

Hola me pasan esta recolecta en madera de fraxinus

03-09-2025 21:59

Philippe PELLICIER

La Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s

06-09-2025 21:40

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi, Does somebody know the genus that has those b

07-09-2025 11:34

Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová) Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)

Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hymenoscyph

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lambertella tubulosa
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 14:54
Can someone tell me more about this mushroom please?
2024-3052-ALV48470 3-16/9/2024 * = LSU ok, 99.65% Lambertella
tubulosa MH872970, Tricladium splendens OR243764, and others
Can ITS analysis be interpreted differently?

Bojan
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
Hans-Otto Baral, 01-11-2024 19:49
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Hello

it is great to have a sequence similarity for LSU, but ITS would be definitely more valiable because it is more frequently used.

Besides, it would be much helpful if you could provide micros in water from the fresh fungus.

What I can see is that croziers are present. But not even spore size is available. This could be an interesting case, but it could also be the common Hymenoscyphus imberbis, which is a complex I suspect.
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 21:06
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Thanks Hans-Oto for the quick reply. I also found measurements of spores, unfortunately there are not enough measurements, maybe it will be enough. Even the first ITS research: 
2024-3052-ALV48470 3-16/9/2024 * = ITS ok, 99.83% undetermined
Helotiales MZ650953, 98% Zalerion, Helicodendron, Halenospora and
others, LSU?
  • message #80569
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 21:28
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
In the water
  • message #80570
Hans-Otto Baral, 01-11-2024 22:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
The paraphysis is dead but remnants of the refractive vacuoles (VBs) are visible.
Actually I see a 100% match between MZ650953 and
KC411993 Hymenoscyphus imberbis strain HB 6797 from Tübingen.
This was a typical representative f that species collected by me. So your specimen is also H. imberbis.
An unpublished LSU of H. imberbis (HB 7894 from Mongolia, without ITS) is 99.8% to L. tubulosa (e.g. CBS 125202), Centrospora clavata, Tricladium obesum and Spirosphaera floriformis. But in ITS blast of my H. imberbis I get only Tricladium obesum with 97.5% and Lambertella tubulosa with 97%. So these are obviously not conspecific and LSU is not useful for species delimitation.
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 22:16
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Thank you for the comprehensive and supported answer
Greetings from Slovenia
Bojan