Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-03-2026 13:54

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Does anyone know where I could download the work b

25-03-2026 10:35

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello,I collected this species growing on a dead b

24-03-2026 19:59

William Slosse William Slosse

Hello everyone,On 23/03/26, I found the following

21-03-2026 15:13

Lepista Zacarias

Hello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu

24-03-2026 21:37

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère

24-03-2026 21:07

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, A friend collected this asco in a wood

23-03-2026 20:16

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o

24-03-2026 15:44

Åge Oterhals

I hope someone can confirm the name of this collec

24-03-2026 11:58

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material de Galicia, recolectado en c

23-03-2026 13:24

Paul Cannon

Could anyone provide me with a pdf of Auerswald's

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Geoglossum query
Watt John, 19-11-2024 14:48
Scoring the characters on Mal's Tombio key actually comes up with Glutinoglossum heptasporum, (13.1) but I thought the surface was not shiny or glutinous. (Specimen shown is a bit dried out.)All the mature spores were 7 -septate and 90-95 mc. Asci were blue in Lugols, 8 spored. Paraphyses were mostly non-septate ( cf cookeanum which was next highest score at 10.) Maybe it's just fallax (score of 6)?  Any thought appreciated many thanks. It was growing in a cemetry in lowland Lancashire.
  • message #80704
  • message #80704
  • message #80704
  • message #80704
Malcolm Greaves, 20-11-2024 09:08
Malcolm  Greaves
Re : Geoglossum query
Make a squash of a small section of the stem. This will show the gelatinous layer if it is a Glutinoglossum. A few more photos of the paraphyses might help. Just to say I have found what I called fallax which had the majority of spores 7 septate.
Watt John, 20-11-2024 13:47
Re : Geoglossum query
Thanks. The cross section doesn't seem to show a glutinous layer, which I've not seen before mind you. But fallax likely I'd say.
  • message #80720