Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-07-2025 23:03

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota

17-07-2025 11:55

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

De ayer en bosque de hayas y abetos, en tieraEjemp

16-07-2025 17:34

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

14-07-2025 11:20

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de  (?) Hyaloscyphace

15-07-2025 13:27

Angel Pintos Angel Pintos

Hello, does anyone have access to the following ar

16-01-2023 21:31

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

14-07-2025 11:17

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest

14-07-2025 15:52

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae

14-07-2025 13:37

Gernot Friebes

Hi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Geoglossum query
Watt John, 19-11-2024 14:48
Scoring the characters on Mal's Tombio key actually comes up with Glutinoglossum heptasporum, (13.1) but I thought the surface was not shiny or glutinous. (Specimen shown is a bit dried out.)All the mature spores were 7 -septate and 90-95 mc. Asci were blue in Lugols, 8 spored. Paraphyses were mostly non-septate ( cf cookeanum which was next highest score at 10.) Maybe it's just fallax (score of 6)?  Any thought appreciated many thanks. It was growing in a cemetry in lowland Lancashire.
  • message #80704
  • message #80704
  • message #80704
  • message #80704
Malcolm Greaves, 20-11-2024 09:08
Malcolm  Greaves
Re : Geoglossum query
Make a squash of a small section of the stem. This will show the gelatinous layer if it is a Glutinoglossum. A few more photos of the paraphyses might help. Just to say I have found what I called fallax which had the majority of spores 7 septate.
Watt John, 20-11-2024 13:47
Re : Geoglossum query
Thanks. The cross section doesn't seem to show a glutinous layer, which I've not seen before mind you. But fallax likely I'd say.
  • message #80720