Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

11-03-2026 17:36

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Je cherche des indices  pour cette réc

12-03-2026 19:44

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybody.Can you give me any suggestions ab

08-03-2026 14:05

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous,Sur 3 récoltes supposées de H. l

12-03-2026 15:45

Åge Oterhals

Dear forum,I found this small discomycete on a ver

12-03-2026 16:17

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousRécolté dans le 22 en France (ré

12-03-2026 14:37

David Wasilewski

These small ascomycota (1-3 mm) ere observed growi

11-03-2026 16:48

Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour, je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

11-03-2026 14:14

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I would like to share a collection of Scopinell

15-09-2020 17:27

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour, Sur branche morte décortiquée de Berbe

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Geoglossum query
Watt John, 19-11-2024 14:48
Scoring the characters on Mal's Tombio key actually comes up with Glutinoglossum heptasporum, (13.1) but I thought the surface was not shiny or glutinous. (Specimen shown is a bit dried out.)All the mature spores were 7 -septate and 90-95 mc. Asci were blue in Lugols, 8 spored. Paraphyses were mostly non-septate ( cf cookeanum which was next highest score at 10.) Maybe it's just fallax (score of 6)?  Any thought appreciated many thanks. It was growing in a cemetry in lowland Lancashire.
  • message #80704
  • message #80704
  • message #80704
  • message #80704
Malcolm Greaves, 20-11-2024 09:08
Malcolm  Greaves
Re : Geoglossum query
Make a squash of a small section of the stem. This will show the gelatinous layer if it is a Glutinoglossum. A few more photos of the paraphyses might help. Just to say I have found what I called fallax which had the majority of spores 7 septate.
Watt John, 20-11-2024 13:47
Re : Geoglossum query
Thanks. The cross section doesn't seem to show a glutinous layer, which I've not seen before mind you. But fallax likely I'd say.
  • message #80720