12-03-2026 19:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybody.Can you give me any suggestions ab
11-03-2026 17:36
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Je cherche des indices pour cette réc
12-03-2026 15:45
Åge OterhalsDear forum,I found this small discomycete on a ver
05-03-2026 10:07
Hulda Caroline HolteHello, I found and collected this species growing
08-03-2026 14:05
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour à tous,Sur 3 récoltes supposées de H. l
11-03-2026 16:48
Bruno Coué
Bonjour, je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur
11-03-2026 14:14
Gernot FriebesHi,I would like to share a collection of Scopinell
Hyaloscypha britannica?
Francois Guay,
13-08-2025 22:41
I found this species on decaying wood in Québec, Canada. I think it might be Hyaloscypha britannica. Would you agree with my identification?-Apothecia are 0,2 to 0,5 mm
-Spores: 7–10.2 × 2.3–2.8 µm
-Asci 8 spored and IKI+
Here’s the iNat link with photos: https://www.inaturalist.ca/observations/301618959
Thanks for your help!
François
François
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-08-2025 17:18
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Hi Francois
the group is correct but I would prefer H. aureliella because of spore size. Both species were recently segregated in the genus Eupezizella.
Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
14-08-2025 17:23
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
I think H. britannica has a bit wider ascospores, so I think your collection could fit with H. aureliella
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
14-08-2025 17:24
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Zotto was (of course) faster than me :)
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-08-2025 17:27
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
My database says H. britannica 7-12.5 x 2-3.2 and H. aureliella 5.3-10 x 1.8-3.2.
(both from Huhtinen 1990)
Francois Guay,
15-08-2025 12:52
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Great, so H. aureliella it is! Thanks to both of you, Zotto and Nicolas!