15-08-2025 12:47
Philippe PELLICIERBonjour, j'ai récolté cette Scutellinia au Col d
15-08-2025 21:50
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
13-08-2025 12:17
Castillo Joseba
De ayer en la misma muestra que el Ascobulus anter
13-08-2025 22:41
Francois Guay
I found this species on decaying wood in Québec,
14-08-2025 17:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello.In the course of forthcoming paper about Geo
15-08-2025 07:20
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello, a few days ago I have collected this Tarzet
13-08-2025 12:01
Castillo Joseba
De ayer en KK de vacunoAscas con 20 o mas esporasa
12-08-2025 19:44
Enrique Rubio
Could someone send me a pdf copy of this article?S
11-08-2025 20:31
Jorge HernanzNous avons trouvé cette espèce dans des habitats
Hyaloscypha britannica?
Francois Guay,
13-08-2025 22:41
I found this species on decaying wood in Québec, Canada. I think it might be Hyaloscypha britannica. Would you agree with my identification?-Apothecia are 0,2 to 0,5 mm
-Spores: 7–10.2 × 2.3–2.8 µm
-Asci 8 spored and IKI+
Here’s the iNat link with photos: https://www.inaturalist.ca/observations/301618959
Thanks for your help!
François
François
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-08-2025 17:18
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Hi Francois
the group is correct but I would prefer H. aureliella because of spore size. Both species were recently segregated in the genus Eupezizella.
Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
14-08-2025 17:23
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
I think H. britannica has a bit wider ascospores, so I think your collection could fit with H. aureliella
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
14-08-2025 17:24
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Zotto was (of course) faster than me :)
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-08-2025 17:27
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
My database says H. britannica 7-12.5 x 2-3.2 and H. aureliella 5.3-10 x 1.8-3.2.
(both from Huhtinen 1990)
Francois Guay,
15-08-2025 12:52
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Great, so H. aureliella it is! Thanks to both of you, Zotto and Nicolas!