Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

09-01-2026 17:41

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, F. dilatata wird von vielen Bryoparasiten

10-01-2026 20:00

Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

07-01-2026 22:22

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm

10-01-2026 01:18

Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Neovaginatispora fuckelii on indet. shrub Pre

07-01-2026 10:24

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl

09-01-2026 10:08

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, en el mismo habitat que la anteriorRetamaDia

08-01-2026 21:22

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, He recogido esta muestra de Orbilia sobre Re

07-01-2026 17:29

Marc Detollenaere Marc Detollenaere

Dear Forum,On a barkless Populus I found some smal

10-11-2021 17:33

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Add-on topic http://www.ascofrance.com/forum/7059

07-01-2026 10:05

Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Chaetospermum on XylariaCosby Campground, Grea

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hyaloscypha britannica?
Francois Guay, 13-08-2025 22:41
Francois GuayI found this species on decaying wood in Québec, Canada. I think it might be Hyaloscypha britannica. Would you agree with my identification?
-Apothecia are 0,2 to 0,5 mm

-Spores: 7–10.2 × 2.3–2.8 µm

-Asci 8 spored and IKI+


Here’s the iNat link with photos: https://www.inaturalist.ca/observations/301618959

Thanks for your help!

François
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:18
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Hi Francois

the group is correct but I would prefer H. aureliella because of spore size. Both species were recently segregated in the genus Eupezizella.

Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:23
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
I think H. britannica has a bit wider ascospores, so I think your collection could fit with H. aureliella
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:24
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Zotto was (of course) faster than me :)
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:27
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
My database says H. britannica 7-12.5 x 2-3.2 and H. aureliella 5.3-10 x 1.8-3.2.

(both from Huhtinen 1990)
Francois Guay, 15-08-2025 12:52
Francois Guay
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Great, so H. aureliella it is! Thanks to both of you, Zotto and Nicolas!