Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-03-2026 12:53

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, In the field, from distance, my

20-10-2017 09:23

Garcia Susana

Este otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu

20-03-2026 16:16

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These 0.5 mm diam. acervuli were breaking through

19-03-2026 19:34

Filip Fuljer Filip Fuljer

Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str

19-03-2026 18:25

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few

17-03-2026 10:09

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d

19-03-2026 15:58

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, I hope for some hints... Macro:

19-03-2026 17:50

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia

18-03-2026 13:09

Khomenko Igor Khomenko Igor

I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches

17-03-2026 19:41

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
Danny Newman, 15-12-2025 11:49
Danny Newman
ITS sequences from the following two collections BLAST together as 99.82% similar:


https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/179610784


both were found occuring on Rhododendron, and both are from essentially the same locality (Purchase Knob, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, North Carolina, USA).  Only one has micrographs at the moment, though measurements are still lacking.  This will soon be remedied.

photo credits: Connor Dooley
micrographs: Danny Newman

Any and all ID assistance is greatly appreciated.  More micrographs are available upon request for the newer collection (303197504), which will soon be sent to Patrick Verdier for a more comprehensive workup.  The earlier collection was previously posted in the Ascomycetes of the World FB group here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ascomycetes/posts/3795982970653879/.  In the meantime, we are wondering if the information provided thus far is sufficient for even a genus ID.
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-12-2025 12:13
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
I consider this R. sessilis. This species is variable in its rDNA, one of yours is in the attached alignment. We have an aff. rhododendricola which is very distant from this. I am not sure if rhododendricola is the same as sessilis which seems to be plurivorous.
  • message #84070
Danny Newman, 15-12-2025 13:20
Danny Newman
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
Thank you Zotto.  I am curious to know more about the known distribution of R. sessilis s.s., as I can find few records of it from outside Oceania, despite it being first described ~100 years ago.  Do any of the entries from your 'Rodwayella - Remleria' folder correspond to this species?  If so, are they from countries other than Australia/New Zealand/Tasmania?  Would it be overzealous to state that our collections are the first to expand the species' known range into the Americas?
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-12-2025 15:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
It is actually strange that this species is unknown from European reports. My databse has it only for the two Australian records and a very recent one in France (Mombert et al. 2025, Ascomycete.org 17: 18), but no more than a short note.

My folder contains only European records. DNA isolates are known from New Zealand (Nothofagus). Luis has sequences from apothecia from Tenerife. 

The species may have been overlooked because it is drought-tolerant, occurring on attached twigs.
Danny Newman, 12-01-2026 04:49
Danny Newman
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
here, for whatever it's worth, are some additional micrographs from Patrick Verdier of the later/more recent collection from 2025.
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300