Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-02-2026 17:26

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :

03-02-2013 19:50

Nina Filippova

Good time), I've compared this specimen with the

15-02-2026 04:32

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

One more specimen that is giving me some descent a

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

17-02-2026 09:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good morning, I found a Diaporthe species on Samb

17-02-2026 13:41

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, est-ce que quelqu'un pourrait me fournir

16-02-2026 18:34

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour,La micro de cet anamorphe de Hercospora su

16-02-2026 21:25

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu

16-02-2026 17:14

Joanne Taylor

Last week we published the following paper where w

16-02-2026 16:53

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, quelqu'un pourrait-il me transmettre un

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
Danny Newman, 15-12-2025 11:49
Danny Newman
ITS sequences from the following two collections BLAST together as 99.82% similar:


https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/179610784


both were found occuring on Rhododendron, and both are from essentially the same locality (Purchase Knob, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, North Carolina, USA).  Only one has micrographs at the moment, though measurements are still lacking.  This will soon be remedied.

photo credits: Connor Dooley
micrographs: Danny Newman

Any and all ID assistance is greatly appreciated.  More micrographs are available upon request for the newer collection (303197504), which will soon be sent to Patrick Verdier for a more comprehensive workup.  The earlier collection was previously posted in the Ascomycetes of the World FB group here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ascomycetes/posts/3795982970653879/.  In the meantime, we are wondering if the information provided thus far is sufficient for even a genus ID.
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-12-2025 12:13
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
I consider this R. sessilis. This species is variable in its rDNA, one of yours is in the attached alignment. We have an aff. rhododendricola which is very distant from this. I am not sure if rhododendricola is the same as sessilis which seems to be plurivorous.
  • message #84070
Danny Newman, 15-12-2025 13:20
Danny Newman
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
Thank you Zotto.  I am curious to know more about the known distribution of R. sessilis s.s., as I can find few records of it from outside Oceania, despite it being first described ~100 years ago.  Do any of the entries from your 'Rodwayella - Remleria' folder correspond to this species?  If so, are they from countries other than Australia/New Zealand/Tasmania?  Would it be overzealous to state that our collections are the first to expand the species' known range into the Americas?
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-12-2025 15:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
It is actually strange that this species is unknown from European reports. My databse has it only for the two Australian records and a very recent one in France (Mombert et al. 2025, Ascomycete.org 17: 18), but no more than a short note.

My folder contains only European records. DNA isolates are known from New Zealand (Nothofagus). Luis has sequences from apothecia from Tenerife. 

The species may have been overlooked because it is drought-tolerant, occurring on attached twigs.
Danny Newman, 12-01-2026 04:49
Danny Newman
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
here, for whatever it's worth, are some additional micrographs from Patrick Verdier of the later/more recent collection from 2025.
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300