Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

22-05-2026 21:35

Steve Clements

Bonjour, I expected this find on old wood on our

22-05-2026 18:12

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

... in moist chamber from Portugal.As the fungus s

22-05-2026 20:08

Ethan Crenson

Hello all,  Yesterday in NYC I was visiting an e

11-01-2022 16:36

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (

20-05-2026 17:47

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Mollisia on dead Juncus stems mown l

22-05-2026 14:47

Gernot Friebes

Hi,superficial ascomata collected on bark of a liv

22-05-2026 14:44

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

in unripe condition citrine yellow, then soon fadi

22-05-2026 13:29

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I am curious to hear your opinion on this mater

22-05-2026 10:59

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Trouvé sur Phragmites, ce que je pense être un L

20-05-2026 21:49

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Lachnum on Juncus stems mown last ye

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Diaporthe spiculosa?
Maren Kamke, 17-02-2026 09:41
Maren KamkeGood morning,

I found a Diaporthe species on Sambucus nigra that I currently suspect to be Diaporthe spiculosa. I would greatly appreciate any opinions or confirmation regarding this identification.


The full field documentation and photos are available here: 
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/338900548


Kind regards,
Maren

Mathias Hass, 17-02-2026 10:29
Mathias Hass
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Looks like Diaporthe. It seems to me what I would call Diaporthe circumscripta (as in Ellis and Ellis). I was not aware of the name D. spiculosa. Curiously Diaporthe circumscripta is listed some places (eg. Bladmineerders) as synonym to Aglaospora profusa (Pleosporales !!!), but not by Index Fungorum, which has Aglaospora profusa by the current name Massaria anomia. I have no idea what the correct name should be or whether D. spiculosa and D. circumscripta are the same thing or different species.

Cheers Mathias
Enrique Rubio, 17-02-2026 14:01
Enrique Rubio
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Hi both.
This is what I identified years ago as Diaporthe spiculosa on Sambucus nigra. The spores appear to be larger than those cited for Diaporthe circumscripta.
Cheers
  • message #84609
  • message #84609
Mathias Hass, 18-02-2026 12:54
Mathias Hass
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Maybe helpful
  • message #84622
Mathias Hass, 18-02-2026 14:13
Mathias Hass
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Wehmeyer (p.261) seem to consider D.spiculosa synonymous with D. circumscripta. His sporemeasures are: 12-15 x 2,5-4. See:

Enrique Rubio, 18-02-2026 20:26
Enrique Rubio
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Hi Mathias.

However, Wehmeyer (The Genus Diaporthe) considers Diaporthe spiculosa to be a priority. Basyonim. Spaheria spiculosa Alb. & Schwein.
  • message #84626
Mathias Hass, 18-02-2026 22:14
Mathias Hass
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Hi Enrique,

I guess you are rigth, but I'm not into the finer details of taxonomy :-) Hypoxylon spiculosum (1857) -> Diaporthe spiculosa (1870) (the name Spaheria spiculosa(1805) is listed as nom. illegit.) seems to beat Diaporthe circumscripta (1870) . Of course this asumes that the are the same species...would require DNA to be certain, I guess, as Diaporthe species differ very little in morphology.
Maren Kamke, 18-02-2026 23:21
Maren Kamke
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Hi Mathias, hi Enrique,
thanks a lot to both of you for the helpful input.

Based on your comments (and Wehmeyer's treatment), I'm happy to keep this collection under Diaporthe spiculosa (= D. circumscripta sensu Wehmeyer) on Sambucus nigra. I agree that morphology alone has its limits in Diaporthe, so I've kept the specimen in case sequencing can be done later to confirm the determination.


Kind regards,
Maren