30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
28-05-2026 16:15
James MitchellHello,Does anyone have the original publication of
28-05-2026 11:06
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596750
23-05-2026 11:44
Charles Grapinet
Hello, I am having trouble identifying this copro
25-05-2026 16:44
François BartholomeeusenHi forum members,During an excursion organised by
26-05-2026 21:25
Dirk GerstnerHello everyone, I'm completely stumped by this li
26-05-2026 22:44
Ethan CrensonHi all, I think I have Incrucipulum capitatum her
22-05-2026 14:44
Lothar Krieglsteiner
in unripe condition citrine yellow, then soon fadi
The spores look like those of Tubeufia cerea but it could be compared with characteristic specimens of this species growing on the same branch. In other features quite different: size of ascomata, asci length, apical ring (lacking in Tubeufia?) and spore septation.
No satisfactory outcome with the Tubeufia key of Rossman (1987). And Tubeufia is bitunicate. Tubeufia or other genera to consider? Does somebody know Conioscyphascus (Reblova 2004)?
Hi,
See in Diaporthales. Some genus are possible (Pleuroceras, Linospora, ...)
Could yopu show us an ascomata ?
Alain
Alain, thanks for your suggestion to make a photo, it forced me to look further.
I have found more ascomata under the bark, some partly immersed in the rotten wood.
They were coloured olive greenish.
More important this time I found several with a papilla (about half the size of the ascoma).
Furthermore the ascomata are soft and start to collapse after 10-15 minutes.
Here is a photo of an ascoma, bad quality but it gives an idea how it looks.
Eduard
Cheers,
Jacques
the species is IKI-, I have tested it. It only turns red in Congo.
regards,
björn
Yes, I remarked !
And about strange ascos, I just found Pleospora herbarum on lichen !!! (on Peltigera rufescens), absolutely incredible but it is true.
Alain
I am of course happy that this collection has got a name.
Björn did a very good job, very frustrating to find something with clear features without being able to identify it.
I had considered the genus Conioscyphascus but was much in doubt because the spores look much broader in the drawings of Reblova & Seifert. Also I did not note the rather long neck (see fig. 27).
Jacques, the ascus top was not amyloid as photo 5 suggests.
I will check the original and I will come back on this tomorrow.
EDuard








