06-05-2024 10:02
François BartholomeeusenGood morning,At the end of an excursion in De Zegg
05-05-2024 09:59
Gernot FriebesHello,I failed to identify this anamorph, which gr
19-04-2015 20:20
Enrique RubioHi again Could you help me with this paper? NANN
30-04-2024 16:22
François BartholomeeusenDear forum members,On April 25 2024, I found one f
03-05-2024 18:04
Riet van OostenHello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Rubus fr
01-05-2024 23:22
Ethan CrensonHi all, Found late last week in a New York City p
29-04-2024 21:32
Robin IsakssonHi! Found in Sweden. Ascomata with haris, se
The spores look like those of Tubeufia cerea but it could be compared with characteristic specimens of this species growing on the same branch. In other features quite different: size of ascomata, asci length, apical ring (lacking in Tubeufia?) and spore septation.
No satisfactory outcome with the Tubeufia key of Rossman (1987). And Tubeufia is bitunicate. Tubeufia or other genera to consider? Does somebody know Conioscyphascus (Reblova 2004)?
Hi,
See in Diaporthales. Some genus are possible (Pleuroceras, Linospora, ...)
Could yopu show us an ascomata ?
Alain
Alain, thanks for your suggestion to make a photo, it forced me to look further.
I have found more ascomata under the bark, some partly immersed in the rotten wood.
They were coloured olive greenish.
More important this time I found several with a papilla (about half the size of the ascoma).
Furthermore the ascomata are soft and start to collapse after 10-15 minutes.
Here is a photo of an ascoma, bad quality but it gives an idea how it looks.
Eduard
Cheers,
Jacques
the species is IKI-, I have tested it. It only turns red in Congo.
regards,
björn
Yes, I remarked !
And about strange ascos, I just found Pleospora herbarum on lichen !!! (on Peltigera rufescens), absolutely incredible but it is true.
Alain
I am of course happy that this collection has got a name.
Björn did a very good job, very frustrating to find something with clear features without being able to identify it.
I had considered the genus Conioscyphascus but was much in doubt because the spores look much broader in the drawings of Reblova & Seifert. Also I did not note the rather long neck (see fig. 27).
Jacques, the ascus top was not amyloid as photo 5 suggests.
I will check the original and I will come back on this tomorrow.
EDuard