25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
30-03-2026 12:03
William Slosse
Hello all,On 27/03/26, in Kraaiveld in Wingene (Be
30-03-2026 09:53
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourVoici des petites fructifications poilues s
27-03-2026 10:47
Ã…ge OterhalsI have tentatively identified this Stictis to S. f
28-03-2026 07:55
Marc Detollenaere
Hello everybody,Yesterday I found a number of whit
26-03-2026 15:31
Ã…ke Widgren
Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r
27-03-2026 15:23
Gernot FriebesHi,this Trichopezizella deviates from typical T. b
27-03-2026 15:08
Gernot FriebesHi,I'm looking for help with this coelomycete on C
Sarcoscypha coccinea
Malcolm Greaves,
16-03-2017 16:53
Mal
Hans-Otto Baral,
16-03-2017 17:38
Re : Sarcoscypha coccinea
Yes, it is obviously S. coccinea. Was it this one that became rare in England?
Malcolm Greaves,
16-03-2017 17:56
Re : Sarcoscypha coccinea
Zotto Thanks.
Yes it was the only one in the Phillips book read by the majority of amature mycologists in the 1980/90s and so almost all finds in that era were designated as S coccinea. On the national records database they have a ratio of 340 : 1360 with almost all the S austriaca post 1980 and a lot of the S coccinea probably wrongly assigned.
Mal
Yes it was the only one in the Phillips book read by the majority of amature mycologists in the 1980/90s and so almost all finds in that era were designated as S coccinea. On the national records database they have a ratio of 340 : 1360 with almost all the S austriaca post 1980 and a lot of the S coccinea probably wrongly assigned.
Mal

