26-03-2026 15:31
Ã…ke Widgren
Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r
27-03-2026 15:23
Gernot FriebesHi,this Trichopezizella deviates from typical T. b
25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
27-03-2026 15:08
Gernot FriebesHi,I'm looking for help with this coelomycete on C
27-03-2026 10:47
Ã…ge OterhalsI have tentatively identified this Stictis to S. f
24-03-2026 21:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère
25-03-2026 22:23
Marc Detollenaere
Dear Forum,On a debarked stem of Tilia, we found s
24-03-2026 15:44
Ã…ge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
Leucostoma niveum?
Mirek Gryc,
15-03-2021 20:12
Hello everyone
They grow on dead branch of Prunus padus.
Due to the fact that in recent times, including the type, there has been a lot of changes, I would like to ask whether these features fit Leucostoma niveum?
Spores:
(13.1) 13.2 - 15.3 (15.4) × (2.6) 2.62 - 3.1 µm
Mirek
Peter Püwert,
15-03-2021 21:49
Re : Leucoscypha niveum?
Looks like Poronia, but Leucostoma/ Valsa are probably.
Edward Tuddenham,
15-03-2021 21:52
Re : Leucoscypha niveum?
The spores in Boudier's concept of L. niveum are eliptical with two large droplets. See plate 346. Leucoscypha leucotricha in Icones. According to Species fungorum that is synonymous with L. niveum.
Peter Püwert,
15-03-2021 22:05
Vera Hayova,
15-03-2021 22:34
Re : Leucoscypha niveum?
Hi Mirek,
This fungus is Leucostoma auerswaldii. Nice ascostromata typical of that fungus.
You can also see asexual morph on your first picture, on the right - a conidioma with dark orange drop of conidia (Cytospora personata).
Vera
This fungus is Leucostoma auerswaldii. Nice ascostromata typical of that fungus.
You can also see asexual morph on your first picture, on the right - a conidioma with dark orange drop of conidia (Cytospora personata).
Vera
Mirek Gryc,
16-03-2021 11:56
Re : Leucostoma niveum?
Thank you all for participating in the discussion!
Looking for the name for your collection, I took into account: L. niveum, L. auerswaldi and L. personnii. I compared the size of spores for these species, using various sources. However, due to the huge discrepancies, I totally lost myself.
Looking for the name for your collection, I took into account: L. niveum, L. auerswaldi and L. personnii. I compared the size of spores for these species, using various sources. However, due to the huge discrepancies, I totally lost myself.
Using your kindness if I could still ask: what should be the appropriate size range for the spores of L. auerswaldii. I'm asking because I found online collections so marked but about a slightly smaller spores and that's why I rejected this species?
Once again, thank you and best regards.
Mirek
Mirek
Sorry for the mistake in the name ... I have already improved!








