25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
24-03-2026 19:59
William Slosse
Hello everyone,On 23/03/26, I found the following
21-03-2026 15:13
Lepista ZacariasHello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu
24-03-2026 21:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère
24-03-2026 21:07
Ethan CrensonHello all, A friend collected this asco in a wood
23-03-2026 20:16
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o
24-03-2026 15:44
Åge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
20-10-2017 09:23
Garcia SusanaEste otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu
Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 15:09
Hi all,Does anyone have any idea about genus ID of this small fungus (0.1 mm in diam) found on Conocephalum sp.?
It has been found on 25th of July this year at 1700 m asl on the glacial lake shore in central Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Here is data about spores size:
(12.5) 13.3 - 19.8 (21) × (2.4) 2.6 - 3.5 (4.4) µm
Q = (3.8) 4.8 - 6.7 (7.7) ; N = 20
Me = 16.5 × 3 µm ; Qe = 5.5
Cheers,
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-10-2021 16:55
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
I only know Bryoscyphus marchantiae on that substrate, but the narrow spores and shape of apical rin are totally different.
Any idea of the paraphyses and their contents? No hairs?
Zotto
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 17:20
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Hi Zotto,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,
