![](/images/nonlu.png)
24-07-2024 13:19
Thomas FlammerI am looking for a PDF of the above article. Thank
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-07-2024 10:13
![Thierry Blondelle](/uploads/user_vgn/-0211.jpg)
Bonjour,Récolte sur branchette de Castanea dans u
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-07-2024 10:28
![Alan Rockefeller](/uploads/user_vgn/-0063.jpg)
Which Peziza did I find on horse dung in Humboldt
![](/images/nonlu.png)
19-07-2024 11:08
![Miguel Ãngel Ribes](/uploads/user_vgn/Ribes-0001.jpg)
Good morningThis Scutellinia from July 9 grew at 1
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-07-2024 06:23
Masanori KutsunaDear all, Does anyone have these papers and send
![](/images/nonlu.png)
08-07-2024 23:34
Villalonga PacoSmall Scutellinia growing in garden soil (calcareo
![Stephen Mifsud](/uploads/user_vgn/Mifsud-0001.jpg)
1. Large amounts of conidiospores measuring (6)7-8(9) x 2-3 um, cylindrical and slightly curved with rounded ends
2. Numerous snake-like (curved) paraphyses, 2-3 septate, clavate with very rough (densely verrucose) walls
3. Dense and x2 (or more) branched penicillate conidiophores that are much shorter from the paraphyses
4. Structural cells with deep yellow pigment, more or less subsphericall
These fruiting bodies are erupting from the fruit's pulp (not superficial)
Spores' size:
(6.1) 6.8 - 8.5 (9.1) × (2.2) 2.3 - 2.8 (2.9) µm
Q = (2.2) 2.5 - 3.5 (3.9) ; N=27
V = (18) 21 - 33 (38) µm3
Me = 7.7 × 2.5 µm ; Qe = 3 ; Ve = 26 µm3
My first thought is Actinostilbe sp.
Mirek
![Stephen Mifsud](/uploads/user_vgn/Mifsud-0001.jpg)
https://grzyby-pk.pl/gat_a/gat_actinostilbe_20200830.php
it is the same one , cant find anything different between the two!!!
But why just Actinostilbe sp. ? There are a lot of spp. ? Anyway you gave me the right track - I take over to do some research on the genus
THANK YOU
Stephen.
"SP" because it is an indescribable species and unfortunately it will probably remain nameless for a long time. Christian examined him and was going to publish, but fate did not allow him :(
Regards
Mirek
![Stephen Mifsud](/uploads/user_vgn/Mifsud-0001.jpg)
We keep in touch Mirek !
![Stephen Mifsud](/uploads/user_vgn/Mifsud-0001.jpg)
I managed to get a pure colony and sequence this fungus and the results where Sarcopodium vanillae - 99.39% Sarcopodium vanillae MK685870
Should I assign this finding to this species or maybe it is not convincing (morphology matches ?)
Paper mentioning this collection with details on the anamorph and sexual state
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338936119_First_sexual_morph_record_of_Sarcopodium_vanillae#fullTextFileContent
I wonder what are your thoughts (overall it matches)