
17-09-2025 19:43
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche morte de Mélèze. Les ascospores sphÃ

17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif

11-09-2025 16:57
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

16-09-2025 12:53
Philippe PELLICIERPézizes de 1-4 mm, brun grisâtres, sur les capsu

03-09-2025 12:44
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

15-09-2025 14:40

Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco

14-09-2025 22:16
Philippe PELLICIERApothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de

13-09-2025 14:01
Thomas Flammerdark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate

10-09-2025 17:18

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

I have identified this fungus as Hamatocanthoscypha conincola, although the ascospores are slightly longer than usually - (5.3)5.4-7.1(8.1) × (1.5)1.6-2 µm, Q = (2.8)3.1-4.5 (4.9), n = 25.
Me = 6.3 × 1.7 µm; Qe = 3.6
Asci 25.8-31.1 × 4.4-5.1 µm, IKI bb, H+.
Would you agree with the identification?
I can see that Svr?ek gives "porus not amyloid" for the neotype collection. However, collections presented here or in other reliable webs have amyloid pore. Why it is? Did anyone revise the neotype?
Zuzana

What is the date of the find and what is the substrate?
Greetings
Ingo

substrate is a cone of Picea abies and it was collected two days ago (11th July 2024).
Zuzana

I would believe your determination.
Quite typical for this species are the blunt, curved hairs mainly on the flank, less directly on the margin.
The spores that are too long are probably not freshly shot.
Greetings
Ingo

Do you understand how is it possible that Svrcek describes inamyloid asci, while today we identity as Psilocistella/Hamatocanthoscypha conincola species with amyloid asci (both on Picea and Pinus cones)?
ZuzanaÂ

I can't say, in my opinion it is a mistake.
Greetings
Ingo