Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

22-05-2026 21:35

Steve Clements

Bonjour, I expected this find on old wood on our

22-05-2026 18:12

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

... in moist chamber from Portugal.As the fungus s

22-05-2026 20:08

Ethan Crenson

Hello all,  Yesterday in NYC I was visiting an e

11-01-2022 16:36

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (

20-05-2026 17:47

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Mollisia on dead Juncus stems mown l

22-05-2026 14:47

Gernot Friebes

Hi,superficial ascomata collected on bark of a liv

22-05-2026 14:44

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

in unripe condition citrine yellow, then soon fadi

22-05-2026 13:29

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I am curious to hear your opinion on this mater

22-05-2026 10:59

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Trouvé sur Phragmites, ce que je pense être un L

20-05-2026 21:49

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Lachnum on Juncus stems mown last ye

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Pithya cupressina with large apothecia looking like P. vulgaris.
Stephen Martin Mifsud, 04-01-2026 17:45
Stephen Martin MifsudI was happy to find these orange asmocyetes which at first glance I identified tentavely as Pithya vulgaris based on the size of the apothecium that ranged between 3.5 to 5.5cm and the substrate being a woody twig. P. cupressina, which I am familiar with, are here found of fallen leaves of Cupressus sempervirens and are up to 3mm wide (mostly barely 2mm).

Can I assign this finding to P. vulgaris or I still need further verifications (microscopical investigations).

  • message #84266
  • message #84266
  • message #84266
Stephen Martin Mifsud, 05-01-2026 08:22
Stephen Martin Mifsud
Re : Pithya vulgaris (or P. cupressina can still be considered)
Reading this article to help my determination..... not easy as it is in German. Will report back my conclusion. I am posting the link of the paper for other members who might find it useful.

https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Mycologia-Bavarica_10_0055-0062.pdf
Stephen Martin Mifsud, 05-01-2026 09:28
Stephen Martin Mifsud
Re : Pithya vulgaris (or P. cupressina can still be considered)

After reading the paper, these are the most important features to distinguish P. cupressina and P. vulgaris (considered distinct species).


Spore Size (at maturity)
Pithya cupressina: (9) 10-12 (12.5) um
Pithya vulgaris 12-15 um

Substrate Specialization 
Pithya cupressina: Cupressaceae (e.g., Chamaecyparis, Cupressus, Juniperus, Sequoia, Thuja)
Pithya vulgaris: Pinaceae (usually Abies species, occasionally Picea, Pinus)

Size of Apothecia
Pithya cupressina: 2-5 mm wide
Pithya vulgaris: (5-) 10-15 mm wide

My finding was on an unkown twig up to 5.5mm wide and spores with the following measurments:  


9.1 [10.1 ; 10.6] 11.6 × 8.9 [9.9 ; 10.4] 11.3 µm
Q = 1 [1.0] 1.1 ; N = 27 ; C = 95%
Me = 10.4 × 10.1 µm ; Qe = 1



So it is (disappointingly) the usual Pithya cupressina which grew slightly larger up to 5mm possibly because they were growing on a woody twig, while on leaves and leaf petioles  fruiting bodies only reach  1-3mm in diameter (here in Malta). 

Eye-catching are the operculate asci !!! 

  • message #84268
  • message #84268
  • message #84268
  • message #84268