Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

23-12-2025 08:27

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Small, yellowish ascomata, with very short a

08-03-2026 14:05

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous,Sur 3 récoltes supposées de H. l

28-02-2026 11:05

Yanick BOULANGER

Bonjour à tousLe 24/02/2026 à Montmacq, devant m

07-03-2026 22:22

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Some very tiny conidiomes collected in the D

07-03-2026 13:06

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Sur cône d'épicea fortement imbu,

06-03-2026 17:51

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening all,On March 4, 2026, I found the fol

05-03-2026 16:30

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum members, On the 2nd of February 2026,

06-03-2026 09:41

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum, I'm now looking for another reference c

05-03-2026 10:07

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello, I found and collected this species growing

05-03-2026 19:29

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,On March 4, 2026, I found th

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Rutstroemia maritima?
William Slosse, 11-02-2026 22:15
William SlosseToday, February 11, 2026, we found the following Rutstroemia in the drifting dunes at Bredene (Belgian coast).
The habitat and substrate (dead leaves of Ammophila arenaria) suggest Rutstroemia maritima.
° Crystals present in the texture
° Croziers present
° Ascus tips euamyloid (in Melzer, my Lugol unfortunately appears to be degenerated...).
A sporee is currently being prepared to measure spores in water.
Can this observation be confirmed, or do further preparations need to be made/examined?
Thanks in advance,
William
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
Hans-Otto Baral, 11-02-2026 22:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
The rather thin apical dome looks typical to me. Please do the spore photo in water to see living spores.
William Slosse, 12-02-2026 17:17
William Slosse
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
And here are the spores from a sporee and measured in water:

(13.6) 14.1 - 17.8 (18.4) × (5.8) 6 - 7.5 (7.9) µm
Q = (2.2) 2.3 - 2.58 (2.6) ; N = 20
Me = 15.6 × 6.5 µm ; Qe = 2.4

Additional questions:
1. According to Index Fungorum, the current name is Clarireedia maritima. Is this nomenclature preferable?
2. Should this species be listed as Clarireedia cf maritima, or is it clearly described and recognized as such?

Thanks in advance,
William

  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
Hans-Otto Baral, 12-02-2026 17:52
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
This is a full match. The genus is a matter of taste. From DNA Clarireedia is a well-defined group, but from morphology I see hardly any chance to separate it from the core of Rutstroemia.

In my folders I use Clarireedia. There you can see the high similarity among the collections on Ammophila.
William Slosse, 12-02-2026 18:52
William Slosse
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
Thx, Zotto!