30-11-2025 12:53
Edvin Johannesen
White short-stipitate apothecia found on thin twig
30-11-2025 10:47
William Slosse
I recently found a collection of small Peziza sp.
27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
29-11-2025 08:40
Andreas Millinger
Hello,on a splintered part of a branch on the grou
28-11-2025 16:45
Nogueira HéctorNovember 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
Rutstroemia
Yannick Mourgues,
25-10-2009 01:18
Bonsoir.Voici un Rutstroemia trouvé sur branches de Bouleau au sol dans une tourbière.
Ce qui m'étonne, c'est la forme des spores, cylindriques quasiment jamais incurvées comme je pensais les trouver, peut-être à tort d'ailleurs.
La clé que j'ai m'amène à R. firma mais sans conviction toujours à cause de ces spores que je pensais incurvées chez cette espèce.
Micro :
Asques IKI+ bb, 140-160X8-12 um, boucles présentes.
Spores bisériées, cylindriques, 16,9-19,8X5,6-6,5 um avec deux guttules, Q=2,8-3,3
Paraphyses filiformes à apex arrondi, septées, larges de 2-3 um.
Qu'en pensez-vous ?
Merci par avance.
Yannick Mourgues
Hans-Otto Baral,
25-10-2009 07:51
Re:Rutstroemia
Hi Yannick
I know this straight-spored form and never understood if it is the same as the perhaps more often seen curved-spored R. firma. But I saw both forms on Quercus, see DVD, e.g.,Rutstroemia firma cf., 22.9.79.JPG and HB 5372.
Your twigs, are they really Betula? Did you look on the wood whether it is not ring-pored? On your photo I think this could be Quercus.
Zotto
I know this straight-spored form and never understood if it is the same as the perhaps more often seen curved-spored R. firma. But I saw both forms on Quercus, see DVD, e.g.,Rutstroemia firma cf., 22.9.79.JPG and HB 5372.
Your twigs, are they really Betula? Did you look on the wood whether it is not ring-pored? On your photo I think this could be Quercus.
Zotto
Yannick Mourgues,
25-10-2009 12:19
Re:Rutstroemia
Hi Zotto.
Twigs are certainly Betula. There were just Betula and Picea all around this peat bog. But I will see that.
Thank's a lot.
Yannick
Twigs are certainly Betula. There were just Betula and Picea all around this peat bog. But I will see that.
Thank's a lot.
Yannick


