Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

29-03-2025 09:08

Martine  Vandeplanque Martine Vandeplanque

Bonjour.J’ai essayé d’étudier un Daldinia.Qu

30-03-2025 10:24

Gonzalez Garcia Marta

Good morning, I would like to know the opinion of

31-03-2025 17:01

akcay mustafa emre

Hello everyone, My name is Mustafa Emre Akçay, a

30-03-2025 12:41

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material seco de Galicia (España), r

24-03-2025 21:26

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour, J'ai besoin d'une confirmation ou infirm

29-03-2025 21:13

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this Cistella on old stem of Impa

29-03-2025 06:21

Francois Guay Francois Guay

Hi! I found this interesting tiny ascomycete on i

29-03-2025 05:45

Sebastien Basso

Hello, I'm conducting a mycological inventory in

28-03-2025 10:34

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material de Galicia, España, recolec

27-03-2025 22:25

carl van den broeck carl van den broeck

On Metzgeria furcata I found hundreds of small whi

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Podospora fimiseda
Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 21:40
Joop van der LeeThere is some doubt in how we address this species.
Mirza & Cain handled it as P. fimicola and Lundqvist as P. fimiseda so which one is correct?

In Mycobank P. fimiseda and P. fimicola share the same basionym namely Schizothecium fimicolum by Corda of which the drawings correspond with todays Schizothecium species having agglutinated hairs. Fungorum Hucusque Cognitorum Tomus II: 29 & table XIII fig. 105 - 12a (1838)

Rabenhorst in Botanische Zeitung 14 Stück 24: 429 (1856) cited that Podospora fimicola (Cesati) = Schizothecium fimicolum Corda however according to the drawings shown in Hedwigia 1(15): 103-104, tabel XIVA fig. 1-11 (1856) they do not correspond to the drawings from Corda as mentioned above, but they do correspond with the current species P. fimicola or P. fimiseda.

I am still searching for the documentation of Cesati & de Notaris about Podospora fimiseda but until now no succes.
It may clarify some things because Niessl noted them in Hedwigia 22: 156. 


Joop
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
Andrew N. Miller, 27-10-2020 21:54
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
The road to the correct answer is extremely confusing, but the answer is Podospora fimiseda.  And, that is the final answer due to conservation of the name!

Cheers,
Andy


Proposal No. :

Cons. :  Podospora, Podospora fimiseda, Sordaria fimiseda


Rej.:  Schizothecium


Group:


B. Fungi
Action:


Csp
Author:


Donk
Place:


Regnum Veg. 34: 25. 1964
Synopsis:


Regnum Veg. 60: 102. 1969
Special. Comm.:


+Taxon 17: 579. 1968
Gen. Comm.:


+Regnum Veg. 60: 107. 1969
Congr. Proc.:


+Regnum Veg. 81: 125. 1972.
Comm. & Rev.:


Code:


1988: 142; 1994: 159 (rev. typ. to P. fimiseda with cons. typ.); 2000: 196, 382 (typ. sp. added to App. IV); 2006: 216, 434; 2012: 362 (moved typ. from App. III); 2018:


Code Entries:


Appendix IV


Podospora fimiseda (Ces. & De Not.) Niessl ? Sordaria fimiseda (q. v.)


Sordaria fimiseda Ces. & De Not. in Comment. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1: 226. Jan 1863.
Typus: Rabenhorst, Klotzschii Herb. Mycol., ed. 2: No. 259 (S) (typ. cons. sub Podospora, nom. cons.).

Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 22:15
Joop van der Lee
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
Thanks Andy


Joop