
03-09-2025 12:44
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

31-08-2025 19:41
Hi to someone.I need to download this issue of Sve

02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

31-08-2025 17:32

Bonjour, Pas d'identité trouvée pour cette réc

01-09-2025 08:42
François CorhayUn ami, conservateur d'une RN en Belgique, m'a adr

31-08-2025 14:34
Thomas FlammerI have found a Rutstroemia on abt. 2000 m on Alnus

29-08-2025 19:04
Thomas FlammerSpores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.

28-08-2025 17:24
Thomas FlammerI know, that this is not the real topic of this fo
Cyathicula cyathoidea
Yannick Mourgues,
07-03-2009 00:20

Cyathicula cyathoidea : What is the autority for this specie ?
Thanks.
Yannick Mourgues
Richard Korf,
07-03-2009 02:57
Re:Cyathicula cyathoidea
The Index Fungorum <http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/NAMES.ASP> has it right: Cyathicula cyathioidea (Bull.) Thüum., but most mycologists now prefer to folllow Carpenter and call it Crocicreas cyathoideum (Bull.) S. E. Carp.
Dick Korf
Dick Korf
Yannick Mourgues,
07-03-2009 08:20

Re:Cyathicula cyathoidea
Many Thanks Dick.
Yannick
Yannick
Jacques Trimbach,
07-03-2009 08:49
François Valade,
07-03-2009 09:48
Yannick Mourgues,
07-03-2009 13:56

Re:Cyathicula cyathoidea
Merci Jacques !
Yannick
Yannick
Richard Korf,
07-03-2009 16:16
Re:Cyathicula cyathoidea
Indeed the name Peziza cyathoidea is sanctioned. So either (Bull.) or (Bull. : Fr.) are correct for any transfer to another genus under the ICBN The general suggestion is to leave out the " : Fr." sanctioning notation except in monographs or special nomenclatural studies.
Dick Korf
Dick Korf
François Valade,
07-03-2009 17:32

Re:Cyathicula cyathoidea
thank your for your explanation
François
François