Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-06-2025 08:33

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Small, blackish, mucronated surface grains s

11-06-2025 16:26

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Hi everyone, I am looking for the following protol

18-06-2025 19:24

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Good evening,On Oenanthe aquatica we collected  a

17-06-2025 14:23

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A probable Hyaloscypha from last June 1st, s

18-06-2025 16:24

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Un minuscule stade imparfait, qui pousse s

13-06-2025 16:34

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Un petit discomycète qui me résiste. Il

17-06-2025 12:10

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Del pasado dia 4  en bosque de hayas, en tierraA

12-03-2025 17:54

Karl Soler Kinnerbäck

Hi all!Do you agree with Scutellinia hyperborea? P

17-06-2025 12:02

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Del pasado sabado, en bosque de hayas y avellanos,

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Paoletti
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:04
Stip Helleman
Hello,

can anybody help me with this article and plate?

PAOLETTI, G., 1887. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia . Atti della Societa veneto- trentina di scienze naturali 11

thanks in advance,

Stip
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:23
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
Hi Stip,

here it is. But it seems it is in the yearbook for the year 1887 that was printed in 1888.

Best regards

Martin
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:30
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Hallo Martin!

Du bist Supermann! Ja ich hätte schon gesehen das die Nummerierung nicht immer ganz gestimmt hat.

Herzlichen Dank!

Stip
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:53
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Irgendwo verstehe ich etwas nicht, wo ist der Dendrodochium pinastri gegrundet??

in Anhang Saccardo SF10
  • message #78193
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:58
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Verzeiung, schon gesehen, der ist in der Appendix
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:59
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
It is on p. 65 and tab. III/31-35. Maybe Saccardo had a separatum of the article with deviant page numbers.

Regards

Martin