Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

06-12-2024 16:10

B Shelbourne B Shelbourne

• Macro and habitat appear mollisioid.• Mollis

19-11-2024 00:36

Pérez del Amo Carlos Manuel Pérez del Amo Carlos Manuel

Hace unos días encontramos numerosos ejemplares d

02-12-2024 19:02

Margot en Geert Vullings

On a fallen branch, probably Acer, we found these

05-12-2024 16:38

Karl Soler Kinnerbäck

A Melastiza from Padjelanta, alpine Sweden, on cal

06-12-2024 10:28

Jiri Malicek

Hello, would anybody help me with ID of this unusu

05-12-2024 20:43

Juuso Äikäs

I found these black pyrenos a few days ago growing

05-12-2024 20:48

Stoykov Dimitar Stoykov Dimitar

Hallo colleagues,I need to consult a xylarialean c

30-11-2024 18:43

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourVoici une récolte du 31/10/2024 sur boisJe

05-12-2024 18:11

Yanick BOULANGER

Bonsoir Quelqu'un a t-il une idée de ce que c'es

04-12-2024 18:31

David Chapados David Chapados

Would this be Jackrogersella or Hypoxylon?https://

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Paoletti
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:04
Stip Helleman
Hello,

can anybody help me with this article and plate?

PAOLETTI, G., 1887. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia . Atti della Societa veneto- trentina di scienze naturali 11

thanks in advance,

Stip
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:23
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
Hi Stip,

here it is. But it seems it is in the yearbook for the year 1887 that was printed in 1888.

Best regards

Martin
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:30
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Hallo Martin!

Du bist Supermann! Ja ich hätte schon gesehen das die Nummerierung nicht immer ganz gestimmt hat.

Herzlichen Dank!

Stip
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:53
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Irgendwo verstehe ich etwas nicht, wo ist der Dendrodochium pinastri gegrundet??

in Anhang Saccardo SF10
  • message #78193
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:58
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Verzeiung, schon gesehen, der ist in der Appendix
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:59
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
It is on p. 65 and tab. III/31-35. Maybe Saccardo had a separatum of the article with deviant page numbers.

Regards

Martin