Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

02-07-2025 09:32

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello, bonjour.Here is the paper I'm searching for

30-06-2025 16:56

Lydia Koelmans

Please can anyone tell me the species name of the

01-07-2025 23:37

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A Pleosporal symbiotic organism located and

30-06-2025 12:09

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 06:57

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

30-06-2025 19:05

ALAIN BOUVIER

Bonjour à toutes et à tousJe cherche à lire l'a

30-06-2025 14:45

Götz Palfner Götz Palfner

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

25-06-2025 16:56

Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co

29-06-2025 18:11

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, A friend found this disco yesterday in

28-06-2025 17:10

Peter Welt Peter Welt

I'm looking for: RANALLI, M.E., GAMUNDÍ, I.J. 19

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Paoletti
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:04
Stip Helleman
Hello,

can anybody help me with this article and plate?

PAOLETTI, G., 1887. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia . Atti della Societa veneto- trentina di scienze naturali 11

thanks in advance,

Stip
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:23
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
Hi Stip,

here it is. But it seems it is in the yearbook for the year 1887 that was printed in 1888.

Best regards

Martin
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:30
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Hallo Martin!

Du bist Supermann! Ja ich hätte schon gesehen das die Nummerierung nicht immer ganz gestimmt hat.

Herzlichen Dank!

Stip
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:53
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Irgendwo verstehe ich etwas nicht, wo ist der Dendrodochium pinastri gegrundet??

in Anhang Saccardo SF10
  • message #78193
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:58
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Verzeiung, schon gesehen, der ist in der Appendix
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:59
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
It is on p. 65 and tab. III/31-35. Maybe Saccardo had a separatum of the article with deviant page numbers.

Regards

Martin