
27-06-2025 14:09
Åge OterhalsI found this pyrenomycetous fungi in mountain area

11-06-2025 16:26
Hi everyone, I am looking for the following protol

23-06-2025 13:25
I would like to hear your opinion on this Scutelli

25-06-2025 16:56
Philippe PELLICIERBonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co

25-06-2025 16:25
Thomas FlammerMy first impression was sth like Rutstromeia, but

24-06-2025 22:29

Hello AscoFrance, I have recently photographed, c

24-06-2025 14:00
Warre Van CaenegemI'm currently in Croatia doing fieldwork that is n

23-06-2025 04:03

Hi, I found this tiny sulfur yellow asco growing o

22-06-2025 13:52

Dear friends,anyone out there with this paper?:DOU

Can you tell me whether there are any environmental preferences of species Chlorociboria aeruginella, Ch. aeruginascens and Ch. aeruginosa? I would like to clarify for myself what same species from mentioned above are able to colonize wood of Fagus and cause its greening. I often find a timber devoid of fruiting bodies. Is it possible in this case to talk about any particular species name?
What other criteria besides the size of ascospores are important for these species delimitation?
At one of my samples I found ascospores the following sizes:
(12.3) 13,1-14,5 (15.3) x (2,0) 2,7-3,4. Could this be Chlorociboria aeruginella?
Grateful before,
Alex

C. aeruginella is a species of herbaceous stems and leaves. On wood there is only aeruginascens and aeruginosa, which are indistinguishable from the green stain. But my data on substrate preferences say:
aeruginosa: Betula, Acer, ?Populus
aeruginascens: Quercus, Salix, Alnus, Carpinus, Fraxinus, Fagus, Laurus.
But Dixon gives also Betula for aeruginascens, and even conifers, and for aeruginosa? a very similar host spectrum.
Your spores perfectly fit to the more rare aeruginosa. Both species have short flexuous haurs but those of aeruginosa are warted, those of aeruginascens smooth.
Zotto