21-07-2016 17:50
Enrique Rubio
I need this paper on Dermateaceae. Could you help
23-07-2016 23:41
Castillo Joseba
Un asco a identificar, me parece que esta viejo
23-07-2016 19:06
Castillo Joseba
Este Ascomyceto en madera de fagus, creo que est
20-07-2016 14:29
Philippe LarueBonjour à tous,c'est mon premier sujet sur AscoFr
23-07-2016 17:45
Enrique Rubio
Hi again Could you help me with this yellow, long
23-07-2016 11:47
Elisabeth StöckliBonjour, Trouvé au sol sur bois en décompositio
23-07-2016 10:15
Enrique Rubio
Could someone help me with a digital copy of this
23-07-2016 09:20
Filip Fuljer
Hi,i found this Scutellinia 22.7.2016 on wet wood,
22-07-2016 18:23
Castillo Joseba
Pequeñas copas, algo secas, con el borde pilosoSa
Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Peter Thompson,
14-09-2012 13:49
I wonder if anyone has illustrations and measurements of the ascospores of Diaporthe samaricola, which grows on the seed cases of Fraxinus excelsior.
There does not seem to be any information in the literature available to me.
Thanking you in anticipation,
Peter.
Christian Lechat,
14-09-2012 14:07
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Description here:
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
Alessio Pierotti,
14-09-2012 15:31
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
The name Diaporthe samaricola was proposed by W. Phillips & Plowright in 1876 with the following diagnosis: "Perithceia minute, immersed, covered by a circumscribed thin black stroma, variable in size and outline; ostiola minute, prominent; sporidia biseriate, colourless, quadrinucleate, somewhat acuminate, .0007 in. x .002 in.; asci .003 x .0004 in. On the samari of ash, Terrington, Jan. 1875. Plate 42, fig. 6. a. ascus; b. sporidia" [Grevillea 3 (27): 126. 1875].
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Extract_from_Wehmeyer_1933_(pp._77_78)