10-05-2026 16:18
brigitte vignotbonjour trouvée en Ariège sur bois une petite
29-04-2026 10:44
Lothar Krieglsteiner
growing at moist, drying-out soil at the side of a
10-05-2026 23:17
Andreas Gminder
Hello,today we found in a moist steep decidous for
27-04-2026 17:16
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. Algarve, moist lying.The conidiomata look like
10-05-2026 09:02
Buckwheat PeteHello everybody, ould this be Lachnum subvirgineu
08-05-2026 11:55
Gernot FriebesHi,found on a decorticated Picea abies branch stil
11-05-2016 20:37
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hi,this very little ascomycete grew on soil in a m
09-05-2026 07:37
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello,please, could anyone share this paper?Ferná
05-05-2026 22:40
Gernot FriebesHi,I believe this is a Plagiostoma growing on a Sa
Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Peter Thompson,
14-09-2012 13:49
I wonder if anyone has illustrations and measurements of the ascospores of Diaporthe samaricola, which grows on the seed cases of Fraxinus excelsior.
There does not seem to be any information in the literature available to me.
Thanking you in anticipation,
Peter.
Christian Lechat,
14-09-2012 14:07
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Description here:
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
Alessio Pierotti,
14-09-2012 15:31
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
The name Diaporthe samaricola was proposed by W. Phillips & Plowright in 1876 with the following diagnosis: "Perithceia minute, immersed, covered by a circumscribed thin black stroma, variable in size and outline; ostiola minute, prominent; sporidia biseriate, colourless, quadrinucleate, somewhat acuminate, .0007 in. x .002 in.; asci .003 x .0004 in. On the samari of ash, Terrington, Jan. 1875. Plate 42, fig. 6. a. ascus; b. sporidia" [Grevillea 3 (27): 126. 1875].
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).

Extract_from_Wehmeyer_1933_(pp._77_78)