14-05-2026 05:36
Ethan CrensonHi all, I haven't paid much attention to Lachnu
16-03-2011 14:31
roman vargas albertoHi. I would like some opinion about this Peziza
11-05-2026 12:32
Bernard CLESSE
Pourriez-vous m'aider à identifier cette héloti
13-05-2026 15:26
François Freléchoux
Bonjour,Voici une récolte faite il y a quelques j
12-05-2026 15:41
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Dear Ascolovers, especially interested in Pezizale
13-05-2026 12:05
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour à tous,J'aimerais avoir confirmation de c
10-05-2026 23:17
Andreas Gminder
Hello,today we found in a moist steep decidous for
28-04-2026 20:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
... on twig in the air at standing Ceratonia siliq
27-04-2026 20:52
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Found on hanging tiwg of Olea europaea in dried-ou
11-05-2026 20:22
Lothar Krieglsteiner
on attached twig of standing Ficus caricaquite uns
Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Peter Thompson,
14-09-2012 13:49
I wonder if anyone has illustrations and measurements of the ascospores of Diaporthe samaricola, which grows on the seed cases of Fraxinus excelsior.
There does not seem to be any information in the literature available to me.
Thanking you in anticipation,
Peter.
Christian Lechat,
14-09-2012 14:07
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Description here:
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
Alessio Pierotti,
14-09-2012 15:31
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
The name Diaporthe samaricola was proposed by W. Phillips & Plowright in 1876 with the following diagnosis: "Perithceia minute, immersed, covered by a circumscribed thin black stroma, variable in size and outline; ostiola minute, prominent; sporidia biseriate, colourless, quadrinucleate, somewhat acuminate, .0007 in. x .002 in.; asci .003 x .0004 in. On the samari of ash, Terrington, Jan. 1875. Plate 42, fig. 6. a. ascus; b. sporidia" [Grevillea 3 (27): 126. 1875].
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Extract_from_Wehmeyer_1933_(pp._77_78)