21-12-2025 09:32
Josep Torres
Hello.A tiny ascomycete found embedded in wood in
22-12-2025 00:47
Patrice TANCHAUDBonsoir, récolte à proximité du milieu dunaire
21-12-2025 21:32
Pol DebaenstHello, Garden, Burgweg 19, Veurne, BelgiumOn 10/1
21-12-2025 21:40
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, j'aimerais connaitre les références de
21-12-2025 21:31
Pol DebaenstHello, Garden, Burgweg 19, Veurne, BelgiumOn 10/1
21-12-2025 21:31
Pol DebaenstHello, Garden, Burgweg 19, Veurne, BelgiumOn 10/1
20-12-2025 23:08
Patrice TANCHAUDBonsoir, récolte sur sol sablonneux dans l'arriÃ
20-12-2025 15:47
Mirek GrycHi.These grew on pine wood that was heavily covere
Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Peter Thompson,
14-09-2012 13:49
I wonder if anyone has illustrations and measurements of the ascospores of Diaporthe samaricola, which grows on the seed cases of Fraxinus excelsior.
There does not seem to be any information in the literature available to me.
Thanking you in anticipation,
Peter.
Christian Lechat,
14-09-2012 14:07
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Description here:
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
Alessio Pierotti,
14-09-2012 15:31
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
The name Diaporthe samaricola was proposed by W. Phillips & Plowright in 1876 with the following diagnosis: "Perithceia minute, immersed, covered by a circumscribed thin black stroma, variable in size and outline; ostiola minute, prominent; sporidia biseriate, colourless, quadrinucleate, somewhat acuminate, .0007 in. x .002 in.; asci .003 x .0004 in. On the samari of ash, Terrington, Jan. 1875. Plate 42, fig. 6. a. ascus; b. sporidia" [Grevillea 3 (27): 126. 1875].
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Extract_from_Wehmeyer_1933_(pp._77_78)