Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

30-06-2025 12:09

Black erumpent on Populus (Ascodichaenaceae?)
Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 16:56

Septoria on Impatiens glandulifera
Lydia Koelmans

Please can anyone tell me the species name of the

30-06-2025 14:45

is this a Hymenoscyphus on Nothofagus?
Götz Palfner Götz Palfner

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

30-06-2025 06:57

Pezizales --Pyronema?
Ethan Crenson

Hi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

30-06-2025 19:05

RECHERCHE ARTICLE
ALAIN BOUVIER

Bonjour à toutes et à tousJe cherche à lire l'a

25-06-2025 16:56

Scutellinia cejpii ?
Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co

29-06-2025 18:11

unknown discomycete from Brooklyn
Ethan Crenson

Hello all, A friend found this disco yesterday in

28-06-2025 17:10

Literature Request
Peter Welt Peter Welt

I'm looking for: RANALLI, M.E., GAMUNDÍ, I.J. 19

28-06-2025 16:00

Salvia leaf parasite
Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A tiny fungus shaped like globose black grai

27-06-2025 14:09

Pyrenomycetous fungi on old stalks of Chamaenerion
Åge Oterhals

I found this pyrenomycetous fungi in mountain area

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Another observation of Cyathicula paludosa
B Shelbourne, 15-09-2024 12:51
B Shelbourne• Macro and habitat suggest Cyathicula.
• Confirmed by excipulum, etc.
• Receptacle also noticeably tough in sectioning and slide preparation.
• Spores suggest C. paludosa (with croziers).

Habitat: On a dead stem of Heracleum sphondylium, +/- standing, seems to have grown this year, damp and shady area, amongst herbaceous plants at the edge of a path, mixed deciduous woodland, Low Weald, England, early September, after lots of rain.


Spores: 12-14.6 (15.6) × 2.4-3 µm.

  • message #80168
  • message #80168
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-09-2024 16:45
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Another observation of Cyathicula paludosa
Yes it is. Can you tell me a date and coordinates?

I have the type of C. paludosa here but need to go through it, it is 9 specimens. Some of them are clearly C. starbbaeckii on Ranunculus. It would be a pity if C. paludosa would end up in synonymy with that species. Velenovsky's diagnoses are too bad, one easily mistakes them.

If so, I wonder why this not rare species that you have found actually has no name.
B Shelbourne, 15-09-2024 19:29
B Shelbourne
Re : Another observation of Cyathicula paludosa
Looking in your folders, Velenovsky's illustratation and description of the apothecia seems more like the photos of C. starbaeckii (shape in maturity and dark patch at base of receptacle), but the spores seem more like C. paludosa (more fusiform with a line of LBs across the length). Although the range of spore lengths is more fitting for C. starbaeckii. 

From what you've said and this description, it seems possible that Velenovsky was collecting both species but gave a mixed description as a single species. I wonder if he was aware of C. (Phialea) starbaeckii and the similarities with his taxon?


I would think that the species I found has been found in Europe many time before, but perhaps it has been confused with other Cyathicula species. It may be more challenging to clearly distinguish dead material too.