Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

10-06-2026 12:54

Steve Clements

Bonjour encore, Pouvez-vous m'aider, s'il vous pl

09-06-2026 18:32

Camille Mertens

Sur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia

10-06-2026 23:08

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je vous propose un Mollisia trouvé

10-06-2026 21:16

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonsoir,Le dernier du jour, en attendant votre avi

10-06-2026 21:07

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Toutes les tiges de gentianes jaunes de l'an passÃ

10-06-2026 13:41

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour à nouveau, Voici une trouvaille d'hier.

10-06-2026 11:53

Steve Clements

Bonjour, This disco is abundant on dead stems of

10-06-2026 10:45

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour à nouveau, Encore une détermination qui

08-06-2026 10:16

Spooren Marco Spooren Marco

I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in

10-06-2026 09:24

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, J'imagine que cette détermination ne do

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Another observation of Cyathicula paludosa
B Shelbourne, 15-09-2024 12:51
B Shelbourne• Macro and habitat suggest Cyathicula.
• Confirmed by excipulum, etc.
• Receptacle also noticeably tough in sectioning and slide preparation.
• Spores suggest C. paludosa (with croziers).

Habitat: On a dead stem of Heracleum sphondylium, +/- standing, seems to have grown this year, damp and shady area, amongst herbaceous plants at the edge of a path, mixed deciduous woodland, Low Weald, England, early September, after lots of rain.


Spores: 12-14.6 (15.6) × 2.4-3 µm.

  • message #80168
  • message #80168
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-09-2024 16:45
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Another observation of Cyathicula paludosa
Yes it is. Can you tell me a date and coordinates?

I have the type of C. paludosa here but need to go through it, it is 9 specimens. Some of them are clearly C. starbbaeckii on Ranunculus. It would be a pity if C. paludosa would end up in synonymy with that species. Velenovsky's diagnoses are too bad, one easily mistakes them.

If so, I wonder why this not rare species that you have found actually has no name.
B Shelbourne, 15-09-2024 19:29
B Shelbourne
Re : Another observation of Cyathicula paludosa
Looking in your folders, Velenovsky's illustratation and description of the apothecia seems more like the photos of C. starbaeckii (shape in maturity and dark patch at base of receptacle), but the spores seem more like C. paludosa (more fusiform with a line of LBs across the length). Although the range of spore lengths is more fitting for C. starbaeckii. 

From what you've said and this description, it seems possible that Velenovsky was collecting both species but gave a mixed description as a single species. I wonder if he was aware of C. (Phialea) starbaeckii and the similarities with his taxon?


I would think that the species I found has been found in Europe many time before, but perhaps it has been confused with other Cyathicula species. It may be more challenging to clearly distinguish dead material too.