05-02-2025 18:40
Marc DetollenaereOn rotten wood of Pinus, I found some green synne
05-02-2025 11:50
Margot en Geert VullingsOn the inside of Salix bark we found white rosette
05-02-2025 10:54
Adam PolhorskýHello, I'm looking for descriptions of Apodospora
28-02-2017 09:34
Roberta PiniGood morning,I am looking for the paper by Lundqvi
05-02-2025 04:38
Ethan CrensonHi all, Found by a friend last Saturday in Staten
01-02-2025 10:01
Vasileios Kaounasfound in the soil, in olive trees and Pistacia ver
Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique Rubio,
06-01-2010 18:49
Is Diatrypella tocciaeana on Alnus bark a good species actually? I can see that the Index Fungorum sinonimize it with D. favacea, but I believe to see very differences with it.
Mny thanks¡
Enrique
Jacques Fournier,
06-01-2010 20:32
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique;
I agree it is troublesome but since Croxall revised the genus (1950) the situation did not evolve. Based on microscopic and cultural data he synonymized several taxa with D. favacea, regardless of differences in the morphology of stromata he considered related to the texture of host bark.
This should be reevaluated with modern tools but Diatrypaceae is not trendy!
But if you gather enough data supporting the splitting of D. favacea, things may change!
Best wishes,
Jacques
I agree it is troublesome but since Croxall revised the genus (1950) the situation did not evolve. Based on microscopic and cultural data he synonymized several taxa with D. favacea, regardless of differences in the morphology of stromata he considered related to the texture of host bark.
This should be reevaluated with modern tools but Diatrypaceae is not trendy!
But if you gather enough data supporting the splitting of D. favacea, things may change!
Best wishes,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio,
07-01-2010 17:09
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Many thanks for your advices, Jacques.
The time will say some thing to us...
Enrique
The time will say some thing to us...
Enrique